Skip to content

Readiness Report

Evidence Over Hope: The Executive Case for Resilience Operations

Most enterprises have backup systems, disaster recovery plans, and security controls. When disruption hits, that’s often not enough – because none of those answer the question that actually matters: Can we actually come back, for each critical service, right now? 

That gap is what resilience operations (ResOps) solves. 

STRIVE Podcast

Why “Hope” Is Not A Recovery Plan

Watch this STRIVE episode on why most recovery plans fail when it matters most  and how a new operational discipline called ResOps changes the equation. 

Video thumbnail

The Reality: Recovery Is Harder Than Most Organizations Realize

Most organizations believe theyre prepared to recover.

The data suggests otherwise. 


76%

of organizations that had fully recovered from a breach said that it took longer than 100 days to do so.


1 in 3

mission-critical applications fail to meet their organization’s own recovery time objectives.

Key Insights

The Stakes

Most organizations have recovery plans written during normal conditions, tested once a year in controlled scenarios, and never validated against a real disruption at scale. They measure recovery time objective and recovery point objective, but not whether the data they’re recovering from is actually clean. 

Yet modern attackers target backup infrastructure first. Compromising your ability to recover compounds the damage of any attack and extends the impact long after the initial breach is contained. 

What Makes This Different

This report makes the executive case for ResOps – a new operational discipline that treats recoverability as a continuously governed, measurable property of the business. It gives CIOs and CISOs a practical framework for defining which services must survive, designing for controlled degradation, and proving recovery capability before the incident arrives. 

You’ll learn how to structure a ResOps Council, set impact tolerances that drive investment decisions, and measure resilience using Service Resilience Indicators – including Mean Time to Clean Recovery, the missing metric between cybersecurity and business continuity. 

The Five Domains of ResOps

 

 


Resilience governance


Recovery planning


Recovery architecture


Recovery assurance


Resilience measurement

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE

Put the framework to work

The ResOps Technical Implementation Framework* gives your architects, engineers, and analysts concrete steps to build what this report describes  across all five ResOps domains, from resilience governance and recovery architecture to continuous validation and measurement.  

*Note that we are eager for feedback from the community on the ResOps framework and what’s required to successfully implement ResOps. If you would like to provide feedback and help to further define ResOps technical implementation details, join the community. 

Related resources

whitepaper

ResOps: The Future of Resilient Business in the Era of AI

A foundational overview of the ResOps discipline for organizations beginning their resilience operations journey.
Explore now about ResOps: The Future of Resilient Business in the Era of AI
whitepaper

From Minimum Viability to Operational Resilience: ResOps in Practice

Co-authored with Deloitte, this paper covers the ResOps maturity model and the recommended metrics to prove resiliency.
Read the whitepaper about From Minimum Viability to Operational Resilience: ResOps in Practice

honor your leaders

Time + Commvault CISO of the Year

Celebrating the leaders forging the future of cyber resilience, clearing the way for business success, while setting the path for others to follow.


Nominations close on June 20


Winner notified by July 31


Winner announced on September 22